Whether you’re looking for your very first VPS or you have so many you’ve lost count, it’s understandable that you’d want to do your research before shelling out for a new server. It’s a significant investment, after all, particularly if you’re going to snag the best deals by paying yearly instead of monthly (or even hourly). So, having an easy-to-follow VPS comparison can be useful as you’re scoping out the possibilities.
Sadly, SSD Nodes often gets left out of these round-ups, mostly because it’s much easier to focus on just the most prominent players while moving the up-and-coming competition out of the picture. Because we keep seeing these comparisons come and go without a single mention of our name, we thought it was about time to put our own together.
Plus, we’re not afraid to punch-up against our VC-backed competitors.
Here’s a couple of things to keep in mind moving forward:
- All of these prices are for unmanaged servers—that means you install and maintain everything—and are for shared resources (aka not dedicated resources).
- All the providers offer full root access.
- There’s variability on which options are available, but all the providers let you choose from a variety of Linux distributions, with Ubuntu, Debian, and CentOS being the most popular.
- This comparison doesn’t focus on those extra-small servers (we’re talking 512MB of RAM small), but rather the types of servers that people use to get actual work done. In this case, they all come with 8GB of RAM.
One way to compare VPS plans is by subjective measures, such as who has the best technical support, who has the prettiest dashboards, which has specific extra features. Well, we think that’s for someone else to figure out. Here, we’re focusing on the raw numbers. What does each offer providers regarding RAM, disk, and transfer? Which servers benchmark the highest? Which give you the most performance for your buck?
Let’s get a baseline for what we’re looking at with the 8GB servers from these various providers.
|8GB plans||Vultr||Digital Ocean||Linode||SSD Nodes|
|Disk||100GB SSD||80GB SSD||96GB SSD||40GB SSD|
Now, we took a slightly different approach to benchmarking than you might see in other comparisons. Instead of buying a server at each of these providers and throwing some basic benchmarks at it, we instead relied on scores uploaded to ServerScope. Why? We felt as though these scores, submitted by actual users at each provider via a script that performs the same benchmarks, could provide a more objective result than if we did them ourselves.
ServerScope benchmarks look at a few crucial aspects of server’s performance:
- A speed test benchmark to see how quickly files are be uploaded to the server.
- A bandwidth test to measure download speeds from a major CDN.
- Disk speed using
- Disk I/O with
- A comprehensive Unixbench score, which aggregates different speeds into a single score that can be easily compared between servers.
Again, using the 8GB plans as our baseline (and the 3GB at ChicagoVPS), we found ServerScope benchmarks for each of the plans in question.
|Vultr||Digital Ocean||Linode||SSD Nodes|
|Disk read||6144 MB/s||2839 MB/s||5538 MB/s||13236 MB/s|
|Disk write||1444 MB/s||679 MB/s||1307 MB/s||2999 MB/s|
|dd (64K/32K)/(1M/2048)||388 MB/s / 389 MB/s||188 MB/s / 225 MB/s||683 MB/s / 713 MB/s||1.5 GB/s / 1.5 GB/s|
|Bandwidth||799.84 Mbit/s||848.07 Mbit/s||654.99 Mbit/s||28.93 Mbit/s|
|Speedtest||529.32 Mbit/s||396.69 Mbit/s||370.61 Mbit/s||35.95 Mbit/s|
Now, we noticed that our network scores weren’t great via the one user-submitted benchmark. This being our comparison, we decided to run an additional test to see what we could come up with. And, one test later on the same spec’d server as the other benchmark, we ended up with some more reasonable (and dare we say realistic) results: bandwidth at 1305.48 Mbit/s, and speedtest at 107.95 Mbit/s.
And here’s are the links to each test result:
This is where things get interesting if you ask us. If you’re after raw performance, you can, of course, pay hundreds per month for a top-of-the-line dedicated server with all the hardware you’ll need. You’ll also be entirely responsible for keeping it running, which might be more than you can chew.
But what if you need to save some cash now, and still get a solid baseline performance while you grow? That’s where not only price, but also value, comes into play.
All of the plans we’re talking about here come with 8GB of RAM, but that doesn’t mean that each GB of RAM in each of them costs you the same. If you’re looking for your money to go its absolute furthest, this is an important figure. The chart below outlines how much RAM (in gigabytes/GB) you for a single dollar with each of the providers.
We also think it’s important to examine how far your dollar goes when it comes to raw computing performance. If you want your applications to perform well but don’t want to pay an exorbitant amount per month, this is a key number.
The chart below outlines how much Unixbench performance you get for every dollar you spend.
Obviously, there are a lot more factors that go into your VPS choice than raw speed and price. Some want the absolute cheapest offering available, and others want more unique features, like load balancers. We wholeheartedly believe that every potential VPS user should take time for market research before jumping into any VPS purchase. The last thing you want is to be surprised by
Other points to consider:
- What platform does the provider use? Xen, Virtuozzo, KVM?
- Which platform features do you actually need? Do you need to run that obscure Linux distribution, or is Ubuntu 16.04 fine?
- Do you need partially- or fully-managed service?
- What do others think about the service?
- Has the provider been around for a while?
We hope this helps address at least some of the issues around picking a VPS provider. If you have any questions for us, feel free to ask in the comments!
Get 8GB RAM and 40GB SSD of the fastest cloud hosting for only $7.49/mo.Get started